Marked as spam
Posted by Janice (Questions: 3, Answers: 1)
Asked on July 5, 2020 3:49 pm
Hello Janice. It is a rather delicate line to draw as to whom qualifies as an appropriate Respondent. For the time being, the aim is to target the very highest and wealthiest levels of corporate responsibility we can. So the FCC and all wireless industry corporations developing, installing and creating infrastructure are certainly culpable.
Marked as spam
Posted by Daroubya (Questions: 5, Answers: 6)
Answered on July 12, 2020 4:11 am
Thank you, Daroubya, for your helpful reply. I had remembered seeing, either in the InPower instructional videos or in Josh del Sol's Take Back Your Power film, that local or regional officials were named as respondents in the Smart Meter MLA. But your response makes sense to me, and yes, we are currently planning to re-educate our local and regional officials about the harm caused by wireless technologies to remove their "plausible deniability." And of course, with calmness and courtesy. :)
(Janice at July 12, 2020 12:19 pm)
Daroubya's approach is a considerate and empathic one which that last point about removing 'Plausable Deniability' after giving those people the points of harm concerned, essentially being a powerful warning with full disclosure of the potential position these people are in. A sort of 'Now you know what you may be up against'.
(Peter Tomkinson at July 27, 2020 1:32 am)