1. NOL

NOL

0
0
To access this page, you must have purchased a Membership and log in. If you do not have an active InPower Membership, please purchase one of the following membership options 24 Month InPower Membership, 12 Month InPower Membership, 6 Month InPower Membership or 3 Month InPower Membership.
RESOLVED
Marked as spam
Posted by (Questions: 10, Answers: 4)
Asked on January 10, 2020 1:35 am
107 views
1
Private answer

Hello Jeff, we recommend sending the NoL and charging a daily fee for any wireless meter that is "near" you. So, you don't actually have to have a wireless meter on your dwelling to do the NoL and to follow through with all nine rounds. And this daily fee can be billed to the Respondents until ALL Trespassing Technology is removed from your neighborhood, your state, your province, and the whole world, if that is what you define as being "near" you. We recommend $10,000.00 a day (in an effort to keep the figures and calculations reasonable). But you can charge what ever you want. The $10,000 daily fee, when multiplied by 365 days, comes to $3,650,000 charged to each of the 4 Respondents, so that comes to $14,600,000 owed to just one Claimant for one year. Many Claimants have had smart meters "near" them for 5 or more years, so depending on when they sent the NoL, they could charge each Respondent $73,000,000 for having to live for 5 years, with a wireless meter "near" them. The total, from all 4 Respondents, owed to just one man or woman, will be 292 million dollars! I think you get the picture....(but please check my calculations in case I made a mistake).

Marked as spam
Posted by (Questions: 2, Answers: 474)
Answered on January 11, 2020 11:06 am
1
Private answer

I would strongly discourage people from using this as an attempt at any kind of financial gain.Spiritually speaking, it's extremely unwise.  It won't help get a judgment upstairs, which is what one really needs to make the judgment on earth stick.  If the NOL doesn't work for someone, they should examine their motives.

Marked as spam
Posted by (Questions: 1, Answers: 6)
Answered on January 12, 2020 1:27 pm
I Agree with not using this for financial motivations. my question was more about making the "penalty" high enough so they don't treat it like trillion dollar companies treat settlements out side of court, then keep on implementing and burning our homes down or entire villages and cities.
( at February 10, 2020 2:22 am)
{"cart_token":"","hash":"","cart_data":""}