1. Private school wants all children to wear masks from kindergarten to 5th grade

Private school wants all children to wear masks from kindergarten to 5th grade

0
0
To access this page, you must have purchased a Membership and log in. If you do not have an active InPower Membership, please purchase one of the following membership options 24 Month InPower Membership, 12 Month InPower Membership, 6 Month InPower Membership or 3 Month InPower Membership.
Marked as spam
Posted by (Questions: 8, Answers: 10)
Asked on August 13, 2020 9:54 pm
156 views
I would homeschool and get other parents to fight this
( at August 14, 2020 8:38 am)
Not sure why so many are on the fence about this. It is a clear NO for all kinds of reasons.
( at August 14, 2020 1:41 pm)
Yes we've decided to homeschool our two girls. I can't trust these insane people with my children. Not to mention I saw an article last week where they finally admitted that you giving your children to school is essentially assent for vaccinating them. Nothing signed. Your participation is your contract or assent. This is how it goes with everything. Good luck. You might Look into Bush Schools and reach out to other parents who are homeschooling and get a network.
( at August 15, 2020 11:40 am)
2
Private answer

Yes we've decided to homeschool our two girls. I can't trust these insane people with my children, not to mention that I won't have them being taught to be afraid of everything and all the other reasons. Good whole thing is nonsense. Many cannot gave truth. Masks are used by surgeons so they don't spit in your open wound. Not to stop airborne "Viruses" this is all about control and ower. Nothing more. Per usual, truth in movies and lies in the news. Not to mention I saw an article last week where they finally admitted that you giving your children to school is assent for vaccinating them. Nothing signed. Your participation is your contract or assent. This is how it goes with everything. Good luck. You might Look into Bush Schools and reach out to other parents who are homeschooling and get a network. 

Marked as spam
Posted by (Questions: 1, Answers: 9)
Answered on August 15, 2020 11:43 am
1
Private answer

do you have this article ?
 

Marked as spam
Posted by (Questions: 3, Answers: 4)
Answered on August 17, 2020 11:12 am
Let me see if I can find it, if you’re referring to the vaccinations. I think I screengrabbed it. I’ll look and post if I can find it. The mask / surgeon part is just something I’ve known.
( at August 24, 2020 8:49 pm)
1
Private answer

article - MASKS ARE INEFFECTIVE AND MORE DANGEROUS, RESEARCH CONCLUSIVE
Mandating masks has not kept death rates down anywhere. The 20 U.S. states that have never ordered people to wear face masks indoors and out have dramatically lower COVID-19 death rates than the 30 states that have mandated masks. Most of the no-mask states have COVID-19 death rates below 20 per 100,000 population, and none have a death rate higher than 55. All 13 states that have death rates higher 55 are states that have required the wearing of masks in all public places. It has not protected them."  Don’t wear a mask, don’t be a collaborator...
Quote from Art Firstenberg, author of The Invisible Rainbow. He quotes numerous studies that show that even wearing a mask during an operation increases the rate of infection. If anyone knows of anything that industrial medicine got right in the past 150 years I would like to know about it. For now, whatever they tell you to do, do the opposite for your safety and health. Here is Firstenberg's article:
ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG As a person who went to medical school, I was shocked when I read Neil Orr’s study, published in 1981 in the Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Dr. Orr was a surgeon in the Severalls Surgical Unit in Colchester. And for six months, from March through August 1980, the surgeons and staff in that unit decided to see what would happen if they did not wear masks during surgeries. They wore no masks for six months, and compared the rate of surgical wound infections from March through August 1980 with the rate of wound infections from March through August of the previous four years. And they discovered, to their amazement, that when nobody wore masks during surgeries, the rate of wound infections was less than half what it was when everyone wore masks. Their conclusion: 'It would appear that minimum contamination can best be achieved by not wearing a mask at all' and that wearing a mask during surgery 'is a standard procedure that could be abandoned.'
I was so amazed that I scoured the medical literature, sure that this was a fluke and that newer studies must show the utility of masks in preventing the spread of disease. But to my surprise the medical literature for the past forty-five years has been consistent: MASKS ARE USELESS IN PREVENTING THE SPREAD OF DISEASE and, if anything, are unsanitary objects that themselves spread bacteria and viruses.
Ritter et al., in 1975, found that 'the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination.'
Ha’eri and Wiley, in 1980, applied human albumin microspheres to the interior of surgical masks in 20 operations. At the end of each operation, wound washings were examined under the microscope. 'Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments.'
Laslett and Sabin, in 1989, found that caps and masks were not necessary during cardiac catheterization. 'No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used,' they wrote. Sjøl and Kelbaek came to the same conclusion in 2002.
In Tunevall’s 1991 study, a general surgical team wore no masks in half of their surgeries for two years. After 1,537 operations performed with masks, the wound infection rate was 4.7%, while after 1,551 operations performed without masks, the wound infection rate was only 3.5%.
A review by Skinner and Sutton in 2001 concluded that 'The evidence for discontinuing the use of surgical face masks would appear to be stronger than the evidence available to support their continued use.'
Lahme et al., in 2001, wrote that 'surgical face masks worn by patients during regional anaesthesia, did not reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria over the operation field in our study. Thus they are dispensable.'
Figueiredo et al., in 2001, reported that in five years of doing peritoneal dialysis without masks, rates of peritonitis in their unit were no different than rates in hospitals where masks were worn.
Bahli did a systematic literature review in 2009 and found that 'no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infection was observed between masks groups and groups operated with no masks.'
Surgeons at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, recognizing the lack of evidence supporting the use of masks, ceased requiring them in 2010 for anesthesiologists and other non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room. 'Our decision to no longer require routine surgical masks for personnel not scrubbed for surgery is a departure from common practice. But the evidence to support this practice does not exist,' wrote Dr. Eva Sellden.
Webster et al., in 2010, reported on obstetric, gynecological, general, orthopaedic, breast and urological surgeries performed on 827 patients. All non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries, and none of the non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries. Surgical site infections occurred in 11.5% of the Mask group, and in only 9.0% of the No Mask group.
Lipp and Edwards reviewed the surgical literature in 2014 and found 'no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials.' 
Vincent and Edwards updated this review in 2016 and the conclusion was the same.
Carøe, in a 2014 review based on four studies and 6,006 patients, wrote that none of the four studies found a difference in the number of post-operative infections whether you used a surgical mask or not.'
Salassa and Swiontkowski, in 2014, investigated the necessity of scrubs, masks and head coverings in the operating room and concluded that 'there is no evidence that these measures reduce the prevalence of surgical site infection.'
Da Zhou et al., reviewing the literature in 2015, concluded that 'there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.'
Schools in China are now prohibiting students from wearing masks while exercising. Why? Because it was killing them. It was depriving them of oxygen and it was killing them. At least three children died during Physical Education classes -- two of them while running on their school’s track while wearing a mask. And a 26-year-old man suffered a collapsed lung after running two and a half miles while wearing a mask.  Additionally in Canada, constitutional lawyer Rocco Galatti is suing Trudeau and the Gov't for COVID fraud.

Marked as spam
Posted by (Questions: 0, Answers: 3)
Answered on August 18, 2020 3:21 am
Thank you it is very appreciate
( at August 18, 2020 7:37 am)
1
Private answer

From what I understand about the human person, and those person's bodies, immune systems, and general health of this organism is that they (we) absolutely NEED all kinds of bacteria, microbes and various beasties to make stronger our immune systems so that we can enjoy good robust health.  Our systems need to exercise and be challenged all the time to keep up with the constant challenges that may come our way.  When a baby is born, and enters the world through the mothers birth canal, the babe is introduced for the first time to different bacteria and the like, and it is tailor made for that little one at that time. The immune system at this time is very, very immature and needs to be carefully cared for.  As the little guy or gal grows, he or she is introduced to many many other invisible creatures that actually make up a great deal of this person's microbiome, gut flora, and general immune system that works synergistically with the rest of their body for maximum robust immune response to whatever may be a possible contender of the person's health.  To wrap up, doing foolish things like mask wearing, and hyper zealous sanitizing hands and your environment, plus isolating oneself from others seems to me to be absolutely contrary to what Mother Nature has designed for our bodies, minds and hearts, either singularly or collectively in a community. I tend to try to follow Mother Nature's rules for healthy living.  Peace!

Marked as spam
Posted by (Questions: 1, Answers: 11)
Answered on August 18, 2020 12:35 pm
0
Private answer

Thank you it is very appreciate

Marked as spam
Posted by (Questions: 8, Answers: 10)
Answered on August 18, 2020 7:39 am
0
Private answer

Right at the very bottom of this page, the WHO has it's guidelines and recommendations for wearing a mask, hidden right at the very bottom of the page. WHO recommends that no child under the age of 12 should wear a mask.  It also recommends that healthy people DO NOT wear a mask.
https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/when-and-how-to-use-masks
 
 

Marked as spam
Posted by (Questions: 2, Answers: 13)
Answered on August 21, 2020 4:43 pm
0
Private answer

Dentists Warn Of Harmful ‘Mask Mouth’ Diseasehttps://nypost.com/2020/08/05/mask-mouth-is-a-seriously-stinky-side-effect-of-wearing-masks/
 
 
Now that dentists have reopened their doors, they’re having patients show up with a nasty set of symptoms, which the doctors have dubbed “mask mouth.”
 
The new oral hygiene issue — caused by, you guessed it, wearing a mask all the time to prevent the spread of the coronavirus — is leading to all kinds of dental disasters like decaying teeth, receding gum lines and seriously sour breath.
 
“We’re seeing inflammation in people’s gums that have been healthy forever, and cavities in people who have never had them before,” says Dr. Rob Ramondi, a dentist and co-founder of One Manhattan Dental. “About 50% of our patients are being impacted by this, [so] we decided to name it ‘mask mouth’ — after ‘meth mouth.’ ”
 
The term “meth mouth” is widely used by dentists to describe the dental problems that arise among methamphetamine users. Addicts often end up with cracked, black- and brown-stained teeth because the stimulant causes sugar cravings, teeth grinding and jaw clenching. They also often neglect their oral hygiene.
 
While mask mouth isn’t quite as obvious, if left untreated, the results could be equally harmful.
 
“Gum disease — or periodontal disease — will eventually lead to strokes and an increased risk of heart attacks,” says Dr. Marc Sclafani, another co-founder of One Manhattan Dental.
 
He says the stinky syndrome is triggered by face coverings, since wearing a mask increases dryness of the mouth — and a buildup of bad bacteria.
 
“People tend to breathe through their mouth instead of through their nose while wearing a mask,” says Sclafani. “The mouth breathing is causing the dry mouth, which leads to a decrease in saliva — and saliva is what fights the bacteria and cleanses your teeth.”

Marked as spam
Posted by (Questions: 0, Answers: 4)
Answered on August 27, 2020 3:22 pm
Thanks really appreciated
( at August 28, 2020 10:27 am)
{"cart_token":"","hash":"","cart_data":""}